<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law On Board - An Insight For All Laws &#187; Common Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawonboard.com/category/common-law/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawonboard.com</link>
	<description>An Insight For All Laws</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:21:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Common Law</title>
		<link>http://www.lawonboard.com/common-law</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawonboard.com/common-law#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lawon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Common Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Law Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawonboard.com/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most often if anyone hears the word Common Law, it is regarding marriage. The little discussion on definition of Common law has to be done with trademarks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawonboard.com/common-law/common-law-2" rel="attachment wp-att-356"><img src="http://www.lawonboard.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Common-Law.jpg" alt="Common Law Common Law" title="Common-Law" width="230" height="160" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-356" /></a>Most often if anyone hears the word Common Law, it is  regarding marriage. The little discussion on definition of Common law has to be  done with trademarks.</p>
<p>Initially, we can start with USPTO’s definition :</p>
<p>“Common Law rights occurs from real use of a mark. In general, the first is for  either using a mark in commerce or file an intent for using application with  the Patent and Trademark office is having the ultimate right to use and  registration.”<span id="more-229"></span></p>
<p>The above definition actually requires a caveat added to it : Really, you  may be first in line if you file an intent for Using Trademark application  ‘Provided’ that there are not any other parties which can claim previous  Trademark or Common Law practice.</p>
<p>As well, Common Law rights are limited to the geographical area in that the  mark can be used.</p>
<p>Following example will illustrate this point :</p>
<p>Suppose, in 2003 you have started a web designing company named ‘Creative  Culture Design’ and is based in California-  the Bay Area. Your clients has been strictly tenants of the  Bay Area. And here your Common Law rights  extent to, also in case your web site which advertises your services is watched  out all over the world.</p>
<p>Previously, a company named ‘Creative Culture’ launched the company web site  that advertising their web designing services. They are  based out of NY- New York and has been in  business by that name since 2005. The organization has also filed for an Intent  for using Trademark application with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.</p>
<p>How does this happen? Now, obviously, every condition changes from the next  and I am using instead simple examples to demonstrate a point. So, if this has  happened to you, get an opinion.</p>
<p>This being said, here is how it would usually work out -</p>
<p>Still, you will be having your Common Law rights to the California- Bay Area  since you have been in business the longest. The New York company will be having Common Law  rights to their city since they have been using that longest there. Now, the  USPTO will as well probably grant them the Trademark since the USPTO would  ecstatically unaware of your usage of the  mark, UNLESS you challenge the claim.</p>
<p>But, even challenging that doesn’t essentially cancel out the Federal  Trademark. You can able to confine the New York  based company’s Federal Trademark registration from advertising and servicing  the California,  Bay Area.</p>
<p>Once more, in case you find yourself in this situation, do contact to  Trademark experts or a Trademark Lawyer. Every condition is special and the  details will require to be hashed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawonboard.com/common-law/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

